Research
The state of mental wellbeing governance in sport — the report the ecosystem will cite.
Anonymised benchmarks by organisation type and country, movement across tiers, the gaps organisations most often fail on, and what changed year over year. No aggregate is ever published from fewer than five organisations — k-anonymity is a hard floor.
Edition one publishes after the first certification cycle completes, so it reports real assessments rather than survey self-reports. Journalists and researchers can register interest now.
Edition one is intended to include applications, outcomes, findings by severity, appeals, complaints, surveillance changes, suspensions and framework revisions. Reporting only awards would measure marketing success, not whether the scheme is trustworthy.
No identifiable athlete responses, raw audit evidence, small-cell aggregates, public numeric league tables or comparisons that imply one organisation guarantees healthy athletes. Every edition states its limits and missing data.
